![]() ![]() In a comparison of four common handheld ultrasound devices in the United States, no single handheld ultrasound device was perceived to have all desired characteristics. The top 5 characteristics of handheld ultrasound devices rated as being "very important" were image quality, ease of use, portability, total costs, and availability of different probes. The Lumify™ device was rated highest for overall satisfaction, while the Vscan Air™ was rated as the most likely to be purchased personally and carried in one's coat pocket. For overall image quality, Lumify™ was rated highest, followed by Kosmos™. For overall ease of use, the Vscan Air™ was rated highest, followed by the Lumify™. No single ultrasound device was superior in all categories. Twenty-four POCUS experts utilized four handheld devices (Butterfly iQ+™ by Butterfly Network Inc., Kosmos™ by EchoNous, Vscan Air™ by General Electric, and Lumify™ by Philips Healthcare) to obtain three ultrasound views on the same standardized patients using high- and low-frequency probes.ĭata were collected from 24 POCUS experts using all 4 handheld devices. We conducted a prospective observational study comparing four common handheld ultrasound devices for ease of use, image quality, and overall satisfaction. Few studies have directly compared different handheld ultrasound devices among themselves or to cart-based ultrasound machines. The recent growth of handheld ultrasound devices has improved access to ultrasound for many clinicians. This is due to several factors including its portability, immediacy of results to guide clinical decision-making, and lack of radiation exposure to patients. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is rapidly becoming ubiquitous across healthcare specialties.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |